Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[No QA] Remove default values for IDs to comply with eslint rules #54306

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro commented Dec 18, 2024

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$#50360
PROPOSAL:

  • Remove ?? '-1' and ?? '0' defaults for IDs in src/libs/actions/Report.ts

Tests

N/A

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A

iOS: Native

N/A

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A

MacOS: Desktop

N/A

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2024 16:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from paultsimura December 18, 2024 16:06
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

@paultsimura Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team December 18, 2024 16:06
@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @VickyStash

Copy link
Contributor

@VickyStash VickyStash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments, will take more thorough look tomorrow! 👀

src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 3650 to 3652
// API expects a string, that's why policyID must default to a string
// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-default-id-values
parentReportID: currentTask.parentReportID ?? '',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

API expects a string

Are you sure? How was it before TS migration? Is it be possible to call this API call without parentReportID or with invalid parentReportID?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash I'm not sure what the API expects or how to test it, but currently we send '-1' in case currentTask.parentReportID is undefined

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Answered here: #54306 (comment)

Comment on lines 4095 to 4097
// API expects a string, that's why policyID must default to a string
// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-default-id-values
const searchForRoomToMentionParams: SearchForRoomsToMentionParams = {query: searchInput, policyID: policyID ?? ''};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question here

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Should it be possible to call this request without a valid policyID?
  2. If yes - can we pass undefined instead of '' string?
  3. If no - add a condition to prevent it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash I'm not sure what the API expects or how to test it, but currently we send '-1' in case policyID is undefined

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Answered here: #54306 (comment)

src/ROUTES.ts Outdated
getRoute: (policyID: string, backTo?: string) => `${getUrlWithBackToParam(`settings/workspaces/${policyID}`, backTo)}` as const,
getRoute: (policyID = '', backTo?: string) => `${getUrlWithBackToParam(`settings/workspaces/${policyID}`, backTo)}` as const,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the initial idea of this ESlint change was to make sure the real values are passed where needed. And the missing data to be correctly handled where the function is being called.

For instance, we shouldn't change these getRoute functions, but throw something when we don't have the policyID when calling WORKSPACE_INITIAL.getRoute().

@iwiznia please correct me if I'm wrong. And what should we do when we don't have a policy ID but need to navigate to this page?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think any of these routes should be used by passing an empty policyID

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think it makes more sense to add the condition on level above to make sure WORKSPACE_INITIAL.getRoute(...) not called without policy id. Same for other cases here.
@pac-guerreiro let's try to do it so

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iwiznia @paultsimura @VickyStash

getRoute(...) is mostly used in Navigation.navigate(...) and I'm worried that if we prevent it from running we'll disrupt normal app flow

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't we just do it like this ROUTES.REPORT_WITH_ID.getRoute(`${report.preexistingReportID}`)?

This way we still navigate the user to the new page but we pass undefined as string

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you tried to navigate to the page with invalid id? What results do you get

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash if the id is invalid, the page will show a Not found page but it seems that all reports in Onyx are deleted

if (shouldDismissModal) {
Navigation.dismissModalWithReport(report);
} else {
Navigation.navigateWithSwitchPolicyID({route: ROUTES.HOME});
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.REPORT_WITH_ID.getRoute(report?.reportID ?? '-1'), actionType);
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.REPORT_WITH_ID.getRoute(report?.reportID), actionType);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make sure it's not called if there is no report?.reportID

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash

But if I prevent navigation from happening it will disrupt normal user flow 🤔 Shouldn't we warn the user that there was some problem, or something?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try to test it as I mentioned here. What happens if you navigate user to the screen with -1 id

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash if the id is invalid, the page will show a Not found page but it seems that all reports in Onyx are deleted

src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 3650 to 3652
// API expects a string, that's why parentReportID must default to a string
// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-default-id-values
parentReportID: currentTask.parentReportID ?? '',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Should it be possible to call this request without a valid parentReportID?
  2. If yes - can we pass undefined instead of '' string?
  3. If no - add a condition to prevent it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VickyStash

I don't know that information, where can I get it?

Copy link
Contributor

@VickyStash VickyStash Dec 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideas:

  • try to call the API call with '', -1 and with undefined as parentReportID - check if it makes any difference
  • check if the defaulting value always was there

Comment on lines 4095 to 4097
// API expects a string, that's why policyID must default to a string
// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-default-id-values
const searchForRoomToMentionParams: SearchForRoomsToMentionParams = {query: searchInput, policyID: policyID ?? ''};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Should it be possible to call this request without a valid policyID?
  2. If yes - can we pass undefined instead of '' string?
  3. If no - add a condition to prevent it

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro changed the title fix: undo default values to comply with eslint rules [No QA] Remove default values for IDs to comply with eslint rules Dec 19, 2024
@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

I applied most of the suggestions but left some questions 😄

@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro left suggestions to some of your questions!

@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Today I resolved the remaining eslint issues 😄

@VickyStash I left some replies but I wasn't able to confirm what the API expects in some situations. I guess it should be face to pass undefined for those ids.

I'll be away until January 2nd but someone should take care of my work 😄 Happy holidays! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants